Power games:
politique, finance & lobbies
In the ‘slightly’ grey areas where the interests of politics and finance intersect, there is always a third player lurking: lobbies. Representing a wide range of industries and sectors, these lobbies are as discreet as they are influential, exerting considerable influence on political decisions that have a direct impact on growth and financial markets.
A practice as old as time
Power plays have existed since the dawn of time. History is full of examples. In the 19th century, the passage of the Pacific Railway Acts provided for major government subsidies and land concessions, including aboriginal territories. These were advantages obtained by the railway industry through active lobbying. The aim: to encourage the US government to provide massive support for the construction of rail transport infrastructure in the country. Even more eloquent are the efforts of the tobacco industry which, despite scientific evidence establishing a clear link between tobacco consumption and health problems, has long lobbied to maintain lax regulations concerning them and to maintain a certain level of profitability.
Finance, a lobbyist like any other
While the work of pressure groups can have repercussions on finance, finance itself knows how to influence the game when it wants to. In recent decades, we have seen the impact it can have on major political decisions such as the adoption of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999), also known as the Financial Services Modernisation Act. This Act enabled financial institutions to offer a wider range of services to their customers by eliminating the safeguards put in place by the Glass-Steagall Act to separate commercial banking activities from investment activities.
The combined efforts of the financial conglomerates played a key role in overhauling the legislation, which completely reshaped the landscape of the financial industry. And the consequences are well known. This relaxation has led to risky lending practices, the creation of complex financial instruments with poorly controlled behaviour, and increased leverage for banks. These developments almost led to the collapse of the system.
In any case, the financial crisis of 2008 and the ensuing economic crisis had dramatic consequences for small savers and large institutions alike. The collapse of Lehmann Brothers is a perfect illustration of this. Today, financial groups continue to exert their influence on the sector. The current debate on the regulation of cryptocurrencies is a case in point. Representatives of blockchain and digital currency companies, as well as financial market supervisors, are jockeying for influence with legislators.
Influence groups and global trade
Pressure groups exert their influence not only at national level, but also in international trade. The recent frictions surrounding trade relations between the United States, Europe and China bear witness to this. Remember! In 2018, Donald Trump’s United States launched an all-out trade war against China, imposing extraordinary tariffs on the country’s exports. The arguments put forward related to the protection of intellectual property, trade practices deemed unfair and the trade deficit between the two countries. . In addition to the policy of the Trump administration
this decision was also driven by the interests of various American industrial groups, particularly those in the manufacturing sector, who felt directly threatened by Chinese competition.
This Sino-American trade dispute has obviously had repercussions in Europe. Although European companies were not directly involved in this policy, they felt the full force of it because of the interdependence of their supply chains with China and the United States. To defend themselves, they have in turn undertaken lobbying efforts. In particular, the powerful car manufacturers and the financial sector. Their ambition was simple: to urge their respective governments and the European Union to find a more conciliatory diplomatic solution to mitigate the consequences of this bitter war.
In this global battle, lobbies on both sides of the Atlantic have sought to influence the dynamics of trade relations between the United States, Europe and China. Their efforts, whether in support of protectionist measures or in favour of more open markets, have shown just how complex are the networks of economic interactions and negotiations between these major powers. It also highlighted the central role that lobbying can play in shaping trade policy and international relations.
Impact on markets and corporate health
Even if they are not always successful, lobbying efforts have a tangible impact on share prices, exchange rates and investment decisions. Regulatory changes can also trigger significant volatility, prompting investors to quickly adjust their strategies and portfolios. The financial health of companies can also be affected by changes in tax policies, the implementation of trade agreements or the granting of certain subsidies.
In this way, lobbying efforts shape policies, regulations and the financial environment, often with significant consequences for the markets. At a time when lobbies are a formidable force, investors need to recognise that their portfolios are not only subject to market fluctuations, but also to various influences and their political and legislative translation.
This is why it is vital for managers and investors alike to question lobbying activities and their potential impact on the various investment sectors. Knowing how to gauge the economic fundamentals, as well as the trends that can influence a stock, a share price or results, is vital if you want to do well.
Although we know that lobbyists often operate behind the scenes – to avoid controversy, establish relationships of trust or increase their chances of success – a critical mind and a good understanding of the issues will give you a complementary angle of analysis. The spin-off of Sandoz by Novartis is a perfect illustration of the situation: even if the fundamentals encourage investment, the success of the company will depend on medical prescriptions, with the income of doctors paid by the big pharmaceutical groups at stake. Reducing healthcare costs versus the variability of healthcare professionals’ incomes – it’s a subject worth thinking about!
You may also like
Prestigious Award at the WealthBriefing MENA Awards 2024
At the renowned WealthBriefing MENA Awards 2024, Telomere Capital stood out by winning the award for "Best Family Office Proposition by an EAM in the MENA region".
The stock market is not the economy
Many consider the performance of the financial markets to be a reflection of the good or bad health of the economy. But this is not always the case.
Market Update November 2024
October was a pretty eventful month for global markets. In the U.S., job gains slowed to their lowest in years, mostly because of temporary setbacks from strikes and weather events.